V The Board of the Chamber of Labour of the National Labor Court ordered the reinstatement of a worker to his job against the bosses of Teleperformance-Cititech. Quashed on the grounds that the dismissal was the result of discriminatory and anti-union action, also ordered to pay all back pay.
Gaston, the fired, not a delegate, but his activity as an activist against employer abuses was creating the conditions to organize an internal committee.
The Labour Court of First Instance No. 31 ruled in favor of Teleperformance, since as many courts grade tended to help employers and workers, thereby eliminating claims. After three years of post-decisional objection, the House V reviewed this ruling and sided with the worker.
is not a minor detail this ruling House, although there is a tendency in the National Labour Court-House, and recently SCJPBA SCJ, which is being developed for workers who can demonstrate that arbitrary discrimination against trade unions. This ruling lays a basic law for the control of workers.
V The Board based its decision extended -80 folios, with national and international doctrine, but also to doctrine and jurisprudence of comparative-international-seen and mentioned the progress that was getting treatment in the justice of the themes of persecution and anti-union discrimination. The employer has a further instance, the Supreme Court, but that option will be difficult with the deep and unequivocal ruling House. The ruling is a precedent and a weapon in the fight for the unionization of the working class in Argentina, which has no delegates in most establishments. Gustavo M.
-From Prensa Obrera 1176 05/12/1911
0 comments:
Post a Comment