More images 
There are certain sports that are directly linked to different cultural consumption, others with social classes, with certain customs or other regions.
In the case of rugby, for the look of the lower and middle classes of Buenos Aires, has always been a sport for the affluent. In my teens, my friends were playing rugby as a means of social acceptance (it was not me, too cowardly to be hit free!) Way to approach the girls also kets, always admired and with an air of unapproachable (basic analogy children of middle-middle class). I must confess
my love for rugby has a lot of upstart, in the sense that just keep the world and nothing else. What strikes me is that despite the outstanding participation of the Pumas on the world of professional sport is still a long way off. Is not it remarkable? Or does one thing remains elitist, where they play and professionalized (overseas) who are able to do anything, without support (consider for example)? I suspect that keeping the activity level remains semiamateur paragraphs to those who can see out of a life devoid of economic output. Soccer and boxing have been historically underserved sports where lack all have played their cards to get out of situations of poverty. Examples rejoice not only in Argentina but in many places in the world. Keep
rugby is rented not keep out those who need to live. A free black rugby, said without euphemisms. Or someone thinks that would support a conservative environment as Carlitos Tevez crack?
A university, in general, and a faculty (FADU, in particular) that holds honorary 1,200 teachers, and 1,200 subrentados not shocked, promotes permanent indentation of those who need to seek new horizons to support themselves. Earn a salary for doing what we like not a sin. Teachers must earn either because they deserve it, because they are for future graduates, each in its measure, built this country. Teachers must earn their salary because that was the promise to the whole society, pay taxes for better education, health and justice. But the schizoid is legalistic state taxes and slave to their employees.
Keep the "amateurism" in teaching is a grave error that no country can make. The work ends away free to those who need other options. Is a system so perverse that has achieved a sublime point: there is a category below ad honorem. TEACHERS ARE NOT EVEN THAT ARE APPOINTED TO AD Bono NO "enlarge" LIST OF SAME. Ie, they are denied the right to existence. They are denied even the title of honor.
We have fallen so low that even at these strikes, for many there is no possible threat. With what could be the pressure? How to cash the paycheck? Tragicomic.
The exception (student worried about graduation, who entered into a chair as a student-assistant pro bono and transfer students to be teachers) has become the norm (for those who like teaching should expect to collect may be a year, two, five or never!).
Many who were shocked reading "No Logo" by Naomi Klein, and his denunciation of the slave factories in countries remote that do not flinch at a college, the third of their teachers do work for zero pay. There are many ways, voluntarily or involuntarily put locks on education. Too many omissions, clumsy or malicious, that they closing doors. The UBA can not close doors of progress because its purpose and our pride has always been open.
If nothing matters everything will be business as usual, with the rotation of those who must find new ways obligatorily, with much indifference, comfortable in the no need for paid leave and the cozy comfort of seeing the wonderful world through a cherry.
I would not settle. Or get tired. Paul
Salomone
(images sent by Dennis Dionisio) 
Ciudad Universitaria de Mayo 
