by
Ibn Al Watan newspaper El Mundo, published in its print run of the day April 14, 2011, a liar interview with the Ambassador of Morocco Noureddine Khalifa in Colombia, responding to the representative of the Sahara western Colombia, Leboihi Mukhtar on the occasion of 35 anniversary of the creation of the Saharawi State: Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic.
The commemoration would be held in the auditorium of the Congress Luis Guillermo Velez Republic convened by the representative Germain Navas Talero. Mr. Navas Talero had been invited by the Saharawi to witness serious violations of human rights, the Sahrawi living in the occupied areas.
Moroccans, are concerned this invitation and begin the counterattack, moving its ambassador to Colombia. Noreddine, sent a letter to House Speaker Bolivarian and communicates with the president of Congress, calling for the cancellation of the event.
These contacts led to the celebration is held on the campus of the First Committee of the House. The Foreign Office and some lawmakers accused the Moroccan ambassador intrusion in internal affairs.
Noureddine Khalifa, explains his position and says the issue has already been passed by the following interview:
(digital media found in this article. I have no proof of whether our representative responded to the Moroccan ambassador, but as a citizen of the Arab Republic Democratic Saharawi, I have other answers to questions put to him by journalists who interviewed him.)
Journalist: (What starts this territorial issue for Morocco?
Ambassador: In 1975, signed an agreement with Spain which returned the Sahara. In this process showed an interest in a neighboring country that is Algeria. Morocco is a constitutional monarchy, Algeria is a popular democracy as an ideological disagreement. Algeria hosted some young people who are Moroccan leftist ideology, members of the Polisario Front who allegedly fighting for the liberation of Western Sahara in the hands of Morocco. No one suggested by the creation of a State in that area until just talked about the Western Sahara, whose Atlantic coast. Algeria's interest is to find an outlet to the Atlantic, this is the crux of the problem.)
SH - Whenever we deal with the conflict in Western Sahara, our interlocutor, is not Morocco, but the international community. Morocco defies the international community, not only for the Saharawi people.
Spain occupied the Sahara, after the Congress of Berlin in 1884, where the strong is the distribution of land and wealth from the weak and poor. Before Spain's territory has never been to Morocco.
The ambassador did not have knowledge that the Tripartite Agreement was signed, unfortunately, in Madrid, which reads the partition of the Sahara between Morocco and Mauritania and the extermination of its population and the exploitation of its riches. An agreement not approved by Parliament and then published in the BOE not to back the UN, devoid of any legality.
Well, before 1975 not as related in the Moroccan ambassador took place 1970, precisely on June 17, a rebellion, where the Sahrawi demonstrated in the capital, Laayoune, claiming the English authorities, occupiers of the then English province No. 53, their legitimate rights to be free and live in an independent Sahara, like the rest of the world's peoples. The English authorities' response was violence with blood and fire on an unarmed population, causing dozens of injuries and deaths and arresting the leader of the heroic intifada, Brahim Basiri that even today the Saharan know his whereabouts, or in other I know the English way.
Three years later Sahrawi on May 10, 1973, led by Mustafa Sayed Luali, founded the F. Polisario (Popular Front for the Liberation of Saguia el Hamra and Rio de Oro) and the May 20 armed fought the first action against English colonial forces in the Janga.
In 1975, do not forget the opinion of the International Court of Justice in The Hague, which made it clear that Western Sahara is dependent territory and the sovereignty of Morocco never extended to these latitudes. He says the ICJ, not the Saharawi and the Algerians. In this framework, we can not forget the UN Commission sent in May 1975 for the Saharawi reality in this remote part of the planet. See its report to the Secretary General of this organization and take notice.
speak of the existence of a Sahrawi state, goes back many years before 1975, knowledge of the ambassador.
As interest in the Sahara have them Spain, France and other countries, Morocco and laughing manipulating him and the people of Morocco, to achieve their goals. The outlet to the Atlantic, the Algerians seek to transport iron Ejbeilat, is a legend and not a cause, pretext or argument that may invoke the enemies of international law, to try to convince its allies that Algeria is behind this.
Journalist-How long then, how it has dealt with the problem? Ambassador
- began to seek an arrangement with the neighboring country, but it was not possible. Algeria supports self-determination and in 2002 sent a letter to the UN to propose a partition of the territories to Morocco. They speak of a Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. What is an insult to international law and international relations. The State's territory and population. They are in refugee camps in Algeria, so there is no territory. Population not in Morocco are living some 300,000 Saharawi under Moroccan sovereignty. In the Tindouf camps in Algeria between 40 and 50 000 Moroccan originating in the Sahara. The Polisario can not represent the Sahrawi because that is a lie.
SH - The arrangement of whom the ambassador of the Kingdom of Morocco, can not be with the neighboring country. They are the Sahrawi the belligerents in the conflict, not the Algerians. This fact is borne out by Security Council resolutions of the UN. As for the partition of the Sahara between the Saharawi and Moroccan, this proposal has no place, that he divided the territory between Morocco and Mauritania in 1975, Spain and Morocco took it. Mauritania
capitulated and recognizes the Polisario as the sole and legitimate representative of the Saharawi people, the agreement is signed peace, in Algiers on August 10, 1979, Morocco invaded the city of Dakhla, in the division above, belonged to Mauritania.
Mr. Ambassador, who is insulting to international law and international relations is you and your rotten Kingdom and France and Spain who are trampling on international law. The keys of the Security Council, are held by France, opens and closes the Moroccans and the Sahrawi European Union level as well as France is Spain and the Socialist Alliance: the paradox.
We, the Sahrawi talk of a reality. We are proud to bring to Morocco of the former OAU, now African Union we are a founding member, with full rights. A republic that recognize more than 80 countries and the Frente Polisario has its representation in the UN. There is an area that divides the wall of shame that separates the SADR released from the part occupied by Morocco and the United d there is a population divided by the same wall, dismembering entire families for over 35 years. If anyone doubts that we have liberated territories, you can check.
As for the inhabitants, lies the ambassador, who knows nothing but lie. Must have advised him that the 300,000 are those living in the camps of Dignity, while in the occupied part, are even more. So that the Polisario does not represent the Sahrawi Just ask the UN and your delegation at the informal meetings which oversees the UN. Who do you meet? Who is the sole and legitimate representative of the Saharawi people? Polisario If not tell us any organization ...
Journalist: The Saharan criticize the wall of 2,000 km. built by Morocco to establish their territory. They say it is inhumane because it is mined and electrified ...
Ambassador: We do not talk wall but a line of defense because the draft of the 70 Algerian tried to organize some Sahrawi camps in Tindouf as a front guerrilla. Morocco suffered much those years for these operations. In 91 signed an agreement with the Polisario, with the participation of the UN to seek a political solution to this regional dispute. At that time the area was under the control of MINURSO (United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara), was not liberated territories as they say. No one in terms of public international law, can talk about the sovereignty of these territories to the west line of defense, that's called propaganda.
SH - The unfortunate Moroccan ambassador to Bolivia, speaks of the wall, but a defensive line. What's been built? What fear? What project is referred to in the 70's? It is actually a defensive wall, complete with minefields, trenches, walls of stone, sand walls, electric fences, radar, etc., With the Moroccan army tried unsuccessfully to escape attacks by fighters F. Polisario.
Presumably this refers to the project Moroccan ghost of Greater Morocco when the Moroccan royal army in 1963, attacks its neighbor Algeria, in its first year of independence, to annex part of its territory. But soon found out he did wrong accounts. Also, years ago would not recognize the independence of Mauritania and entered one and the other is the Sahara.
in any UN resolution, referred to a regional dispute. But, yes to a referendum in which the Saharawi people to decide their future in a fair, free and transparent.
As liberated territories, yes there are, where they fly the flag of the SADR, where soldiers patrol the Saharawi and Moroccan where no ... A bit of consistency in the statements. Before the conclusion of the XII Congress of the Polisario Front, the King Mohamed VI, recognized the existence of these and was going to attack them, while this gives the lie.
Journalist - If no partition is, what is the solution for Morocco?
Embajador: En 2007 Marruecos propuso un plan de autonomía para el Sahara, una autonomía más ancha que la de Cataluña en España, para solucionar el problema. En este marco, Marruecos va a conservar la bandera, la moneda y la defensa nacional de la acción externa, nada más. Estamos en negociaciones formales e informales con el Polisario, y la presencia de Mauritania y Argelia, para lograr una solución realista.
SH – Lo que los saharauis han firmado, ante la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas, un Plan de Paz, auspiciado por la ONU, donde los saharauis decidirán cual quieren que sea su futuro. Autonomías anchas o estrechas, dentro de Marruecos que el Sahara never part of the monarchy. As for the negotiations, formal and informal traders, through an order of the day, exchange ideas and opinions, not unlike what makes Morocco. I have an autonomy plan and I will not argue otherwise. With your flag, your currency and your defense to Morocco. We do not need.
The realistic solution is that the Saharawi, through the ballot box to decide their future. It is so difficult for the Moroccan side, as easy for the Sahrawi, Sahrawi, represented by the Polisario, it is against the Saharawi choose between three options: independence, autonomy or integration in Morocco, but the Saharawi say what they want, it still opposes Morocco.
Journalist - you already passed the problem on the initiative for the representative SADR Navas Talero?
Ambassador: Yes Although I have never spoken to him, by the Hon Talero Navas I have great respect, although it has uttered hostile statements against Morocco. In all this there mentioned something very important, they say that I interfered, but what I did was react to seeing an invitation card to the event mentioned within the Congress premises. I called the president of Congress and explained that it was lies, Colombia does not recognize this imaginary republic, there is no relationship and that this was an insult to Morocco.
SH - In what are sure of is that the institutions of this country will not take positions contrary to international law, so one way or another will be for the Saharawi people's just struggle for independence and support the United Nations resolutions in this regard. Moroccans say that what they say. Bolivia sooner or later will recognize the SADR.
P JOURNALIST - How is the situation in Morocco after popular protests in late February?
Ambassador: The monarchy in Morocco is very popular, people might criticize the parliament, the prime minister, but no one criticized the King Mohamed VI. The surveys were peaceful background of wage claims and housing. In the March 9 speech of his majesty, the king spoke of further commitments for reform. Now there is a Advisory Council for constitutional reform that addresses the concerns of the people to improve social conditions. Let's continue.
SH - The monarchy of Morocco is the world's worst. The monarch and his associates control everything, and money take over the entire kingdom, while the poor and miserable lives to the fate of the outdoors in subhuman conditions. The defense of human rights in the vocabulary there is Alawite. No democracy, no freedom of movement, no freedom of expression. Everything is controlled by King Mohamed VI and the ambassador says. We do not understand what we mean: if it's good or bad not to criticize the monarch, who is to blame for everything. The propaganda of the security apparatus wants everything polished with great care, but the monkey but dresses in silk, mono stays. The Moroccans are protesting in the streets, have had enough of such humiliation, lies and deceit.
Journalist - What do you think the wave of change in the Arab world?
Ambassador: Morocco is aware of the legitimacy of the claims required by Arab youth, their aspirations for democracy and freedom. In the case of Libya, Morocco was the first Arab countries that joined the coalition against Gaddafi, are also participating in humanitarian operations in Libya, for us it's about helping these people. We hope that all these social processes leading to democracy and freedom.
SH - Morocco, but the ambassador did not confess, is best placed to undergo changes, because nothing can breathe democracy and freedoms in Morocco. As the integration of Morocco in the alliance, in the Libyan conflict is not to defend democracy and freedom, something the kingdom of Morocco is not known, but by pandering to the whims and interests of its owners: France, Spain and others.
The Saharawi people will win and his victory is closer.
Viva Saharawi people! Viva el Frente Polisario! Ibn Al Watan
04/26/1911 -------------- This text expresses the opinion of the author and not the moderators.
0 comments:
Post a Comment